"Going Clear is an attempt to cut through the morass of obscurity and misinformation, to provide an accurate account of Scientology's history and a fair assessment of its claims. This is not an easy task, in large part because Scientologists themselves — particularly those at the top of the Church's hierarchy — have long made it their policy to discourage open inquiry, both by members and by outsiders"
Amusingly enough, almost anything from a Lawrence Wright key word search to the Chicago Tribune review (and probably any other) has paid ads from Scientology. I suspect that if I was on an ad-supported blog, it would be here too!
"It's more than a fig leaf when Kidder, a long-form journalist and winner of the Pulitzer Prize, National Book Award and many other accolades, mentions his editors' harsh assessments of his early work. Those are important to hear. And it's important to know that Kidder still suffers from disorganization, ballooning prose and melodrama."
But I still don't know how the books are connected. I ask Jason. He told me that he didn't get much info on the sales call about this one. He thought the book was an extrapolation, but noted that the publisher sees the book as important, as there was promotional money available for taking a face out quantity.
Aha! I decoided to read Branch's preface and learned that this book is a distillation of the work that was covered in three volumes over 2300 plus pages. It's eighteen pivotal stories, and I think that's great, because I think the odds are greater that I can get someone to read this than I can the trilogy.
Oakes has gotten some nice reviews for the book, but I was most intrigued by this piece in the Los Angeles Review of Books, reprinted in Salon, about what was historically accurate and what was not in the movie Lincoln. Here Kelly Candaele writes:
"Historian James Oakes, in his book Freedom National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, published in early December, suggests that Lincoln screenwriter Tony Kushner might have that part of the history right. Oakes points out that a large number of Republicans felt that the amendment abolishing slavery was a 'civil' rather than 'military' measure, and that the basis for changing the constitution was thus linked to the winning of the war. As the war’s end drew closer, the justification for the 13th Amendment was potentially undermined"
Need a review? Kirkus's recommendation: "A finely argued book about how the destruction of slavery involved much more than Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation." I could have also sworn I heard Oakes on NPR, but I can't find the link.
"Berg does a remarkable job with the story and its aftermath, drawing on memoirs, contemporary reports and presidential papers to re-create — and offer an easy road map through — a complicated narrative. He lets the morality of individual acts and actors stand and fall on their own merits, though it's clear he believes that many of the condemned Dakota were railroaded"
And speaking of timing, the Washington Post observed (no byline, by the way) that 38 Nooses was published 150 years after the Mankato mass hanging, a memorial to this sad incident. Oh, and Boswellian Paul is from Mankato, but I don't know what that has to do with anything.
All titles are 20% off in store, at least through next Monday, January 21.
No comments:
Post a Comment