data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c57d1/c57d1c4a4a6334776b98c02506cc76c40096a96e" alt=""
The book was reviewed everywhere, and got an A- from Entertainment Weekly, which I event subscribe to in hard copy, and yes. Jess Walter called The Affairs of Others "a wonderful novel, beautifully written and sensuous, rich with emotion and psychological truth. Amy Grace Loyd's prose hums with desire as she creates a Brooklyn walk-up that comes alive with the yearning of its tenants and moves them toward an unforgettable ending--suspenseful, erotic, and ultimately hopeful." The only change to the jacket in paperback was the addition of some quotes in the stylistic window panes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f54d1/f54d114b7ec46cdd6be7297bb6730993a7e93eaa" alt=""
I have found that Hachette is one of those houses who changes a paperback jacket when they have reason to, but seem more likely to hold onto an idea that they like. The jackets for Identical, the recent novel from Scott Turow, are also pretty much identical. This is a thriller about twin brother's in fictional Kindle County (a now ironically named place, considering that Amazon is likely suppressing its sales in the name of negotiation, but this Yoknapatawpha was coined many books ago in Turow's literary universe), one a politician and the other an ex-con, and this is where one of you makes a cheap joke. I guess that the publisher decided that the book did well enough and the image conveyed the message. My one complaint is the quote on the paperback: "Turow is always a pleasure to read" from The Washington Post. Why bother with such a milquetoast recommendation?
I'll tell you what I miss. Remember when a successful hardcover would be followed up by a paperback, always a mass market, with multiple jacket designs. I don't know what the world record is, but four wasn't unusual. Often it was just a different color. Honestly the last trade paperback I can remember with multiple jackets was No One Belongs Here More Than You, Miranda July's wonderful short story collection from way back in 2007 (with the paperback out in 2008). Can you remember anything more recent?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b784/6b7842678174ac1ce59fe8fd549314158d74b458" alt=""
Once again, I'm not sure how I feel about the use of The New York Times quote, "Fannie Flagg is a born storyteller." Publishers do two things that drive me crazy about quotes. First of all, they never include the author of the quote, just the newspaper or magazine it came from. I find this really strange, because at the same time, they really push us to acknowledge the photographer in author photos--doesn't it seem that acknowledging the writer to be the equivalent courtesy? And the other thing that drives me crazy is they don't ever mention what book was being reviewed. This quote could be for Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe, which came out in 1987. Heck, it could be from one of her appearances on Match Game '75. She was charming in both, honestly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e972f/e972f7e5b9f24085d363aec1308869dcc76b9977" alt=""
Pico Iyer gave the book a strong review in Time magazine (currently not linkable to my knowledge, these things change weekly) who wrote "As Aw orchestrates the overlapping of his lost souls, the story comes to acquire the mirrored complexity of its setting. No one knows who anyone is—not even themselves—and when one character reveals himself as a (real) celebrity, he’s taken to be the most shameless fake of all. And because Aw’s polyphonic structure shows us every character as they look to themselves, and as they’re seen by others, we teeter at every moment on the gap between reality and appearance." Now there's a quote to put on a jacket, right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7323e/7323e602d8c583f035990030fee9ffb013e705ef" alt=""
There was a transitional cover that Sharon and I saw, and I think we agree that the final jacket is better, but I'm not sure who the woman is (the blind curator? I'm sure Sharon will know) and I'm not sure it conveys the sense of wonder that comes with reading this rather magical story. Yeah, that's a not-so-subtle way of saying Van Booy is coming on September 30. I'm looking forward to re-reading the book again for our book club discussion on August 25. And here's Jessica Lasko's Wall Street Journal review if you need a little more persuasion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e9/3c2e9d0819e422d62b2912160d17aea3a70d7660" alt=""
In this case, I can see why the changes were made in this jacket for the paperback. That hardcover image is trying to convey the historical origins of the story, but it does a better job of just seeming creepy. Are these the dead victims, gathered together as ghosts, floating in West Virginia? The paperback jacket's empty swing conveys the creepiness in a more straightforward way--we know what we're getting into. That hardcover image isn't just creepy; it's a bit bizarre as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment