Just because someone has a great story, it doesn't mean they have a great book. But Just Mercy is a triumph in that regard as well. Stevenson does triple duty in his book. The overarching story chronicles the case of Walter McMillan, on death row for murdering a woman, convicted with very flimsy evidence. But in between telling that tale he covers a different subject, perhaps judges' authority to override juries in several states, perhaps the rise in convicting pregnant women. And much about the rise in trying juveniles as adults. I call it The Good Wife structure, though How to Get Away with Murder is another good example - you tell one long story counterpointed with self-contained shorter stories. It apparently works well both for television and books.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/554ff/554ff57940eb1a63b4afad42b24b8d1be6b5fe5a" alt=""
And then of course we have another story, that of Stevenson's life, or at least that of the Equal Justice Initiative's growth. You can't really call this a memoir, even though it's first person, as Stevenson really tries to step back from the story and focus on the folks profiled. The only time Steveson is in the spotlight is when he recounts being targeted by the Atlanta police for being a Black man in a neighborhood that had a reported robbery and the policeman suggests he not move...or else. The actual quote from Stevenson is quite a bit worse than that. He is aggressively searched and explanations are not allowed. If you think this is acceptable, under the circumstances, how would you feel if it happened to you?
A bystander tells the police to ask Stevenson about her missing cat, among other things. The police eventually realize that they've made a mistake. There are no apologies. It's a comic line in a tragic scenario.
One attendee thought it was a great book to read in tandem with Ta-Nehisi Coates' Between the World and Me. Both were edited by Chris Jackson, and Coates has actually been talking up Just Mercy.
We talked a lot about the cases with children in particular. We noted the difference in the adolescent brain, and I spoke about Kent Kiel's book, The Psychopath Whisperer, confirming through scans that teenagers brains can and do change, but that prison does not have the hoped-for consequence of reforming criminals.
We also discussed the plight of folks with mental illness. Prisons were used to contain those with mental illness until reform created hospitals. And now we've swung in the other direction, defunding care facilities, and that's led to more folks with mental illness back in prisons.
Our resident alien was probably the most horrified by the story, though certainly she wasn't surprised. As an Australian, she is amused by various American foibles.
We had a solid hour of animated discussion, with just about everyone having something to add to the conversation.
If you're looking for additional reading, Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow is probably another book to add to your to-be-read list.
In May, we'll be discussing Angela Flournoy's The Turner House. That discussion is Monday, May 2, 7 pm. This novel about a Detroit family was shortlisted for the National Book Award. Our in-store lit group discussions are held in the magazine area. There is no pre-registration required.
No comments:
Post a Comment